From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: [patch 0/3][netns] fix and wipeout timewait sockets Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:24:14 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20070924132935.398625515@mai.toulouse-stg.fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070924132935.398625515-WECHFHqYCmGD/CxQmPlnQ0FT0OZdM7KVQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> (Daniel Lezcano's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2007 15:29:35 +0200") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Daniel Lezcano writes: > Denis Lunev spotted that using a reference to the network namespace > with the timewait sockets will be a waste of time because they > are pointless while we will remove the network stack at network > namespace exit. The patches look close and look like they are in the right general direction. I haven't reviewed them closely yet, so I suspect there are a few more nits but generally they look good. Please don't let me forget about this issue. Thanks, Eric