From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org (Eric W. Biederman) Subject: Re: net 2.6.25 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:52:46 -0700 Message-ID: References: <473AC169.1030202@sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: In-Reply-To: <473AC169.1030202-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org> (Denis V. Lunev's message of "Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:35:37 +0300") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Denis V. Lunev" Cc: Linux Containers , Benjamin Thery List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org "Denis V. Lunev" writes: > Hello, guys! > > David has been opened net-2.6.25 tree yesterday, so we could send a new > portion of NETNS there. If there are no objections, I'll send first six > patches from OpenVZ GIT tomorrow, i.e. RTNL infrastructure, Packet & > Unix sockets virtualization + some our /proc cleanups. I think I can pretty much agree on that set of patches. However I do strongly object to the form they are in at: http://git.openvz.org/?p=linux-2.6-netns All of my subject lines (which are the primary summary of the patch) have been lost. So it is much more difficult to see what the patch is doing. I will get some sleep and see what I can sort out. Eric