From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kukjin Kim Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 0/7] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 10:37:50 +0900 Message-ID: <032801cf7883$1cde3fd0$569abf70$@samsung.com> References: <1400855260-6807-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <5382739A.60800@samsung.com> <538294F9.2060508@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <538294F9.2060508@gmail.com> Content-language: ko Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: 'Tomasz Figa' , 'Thomas Abraham' Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, mturquette@linaro.org, shawn.guo@linaro.org, t.figa@samsung.com, l.majewski@samsung.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, heiko@sntech.de Tomasz Figa wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > On 26.05.2014 00:50, Kukjin Kim wrote: > > On 05/23/14 23:27, Thomas Abraham wrote: > >> Changes since v4: > >> - Various changes in clock code suggested by Tomasz > >> Figa > >> - This series depends on mutiple other patches > >> [a] patch that introduces read-only attribute for clock dividers. > >> - > >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014- > May/259264.html > >> > >> [b] the series "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP > >> layer" > >> - > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg104610.html > >> [c] the series "cpufreq: opp: Add device tree based lookup of boost > >> mode frequency" > >> - http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg334336.html > >> > > This series looks good to me after quick loking at but as I replied on > > other thread, I'm not sure above changes are ready for 3.16 or not... > > > > Maybe we can revisit this series for 3.17?...hmm... > > Also two more issues: > > 1) DT bindings are not acked by DT maintainers, > 2) there are my comments to DT bindings from v4 not addressed. > > There are also several comments about the code of v4 not addressed, but > this is not that important, as opposed to DT bindings which are supposed > to be stable ABI. > > Still, I don't think this is a big deal anymore, as we can have cpufreq > working with multiplatform with my hack patch and polish the > implementation of this series without any hurry. > Yeah, I'm waiting for Viresh's ack on your v2 exynos-cpufreq changes for multiplatform... - Kukjin