From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ashley Pittman Subject: Re: problems with longhaul cpufreq driver. Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 16:39:03 +0000 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <1070901543.27939.103.camel@ashley> References: <20031208162600.mgillespie@Plus.Net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20031208162600.mgillespie@Plus.Net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: mgillespie@mgillespie.plus.com Cc: cpufreq On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:26, mgillespie@mgillespie.plus.com wrote: > If I check the dmesg log, I see the following on startup: > > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v2 supported. > longhaul: MinMult=5.0x MaxMult=6.0x > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz > longhaul: FSB:0 Mult:10.0x The problem here is the FSB is being reported as 0, this is wrong. > Anyone else got this problem? I had a very similar problem with my c3 using a 2.6 kernel, I posted a patch to this list a while ago that, whilst incorrect in some ways is probably enough to allow the module to work. There was a discussion about a better way to do it but I don't think that anything has been committed yet. I would be interested to know if the patch works for you. Ashley,