From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:15:38 +0100 Message-ID: <1152634538.18028.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1152622554.4489.32.camel@lapdog.site> <200607111507.39079.ak@suse.de> <1152623675.3128.41.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1152623675.3128.41.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andi Kleen , Joachim Deguara , Mark Langsdorf , discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk Ar Maw, 2006-07-11 am 15:14 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven: > if you have per cpu offset and speed, then you don't even need to tie > all frequencies together... sounds like the best solution to me.. CPU clocks on some systems are not stable relative to one another. Doing the maths only works if you know the divergence isn't cause by independant clock sources