From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/32] cpufreq: use system_wq instead of dedicated workqueues
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:49:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1294062595-30097-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
With cmwq, there's no reason for cpufreq drivers to use separate
workqueues. Remove the dedicated workqueues from cpufreq_conservative
and cpufreq_ondemand and use system_wq instead. The work items are
already sync canceled on stop, so it's already guaranteed that no work
is running on module exit.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
---
Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.
Thanks.
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 22 +++-------------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 20 +++-----------------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 526bfbf..94284c8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -81,8 +81,6 @@ static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex);
-static struct workqueue_struct *kconservative_wq;
-
static struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int sampling_rate;
unsigned int sampling_down_factor;
@@ -560,7 +558,7 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
dbs_check_cpu(dbs_info);
- queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, kconservative_wq, &dbs_info->work, delay);
+ schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
}
@@ -572,8 +570,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
dbs_info->enable = 1;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
- queue_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, kconservative_wq, &dbs_info->work,
- delay);
+ schedule_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
}
static inline void dbs_timer_exit(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
@@ -716,25 +713,12 @@ struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative = {
static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
{
- int err;
-
- kconservative_wq = create_workqueue("kconservative");
- if (!kconservative_wq) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Creation of kconservative failed\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- }
-
- err = cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_conservative);
- if (err)
- destroy_workqueue(kconservative_wq);
-
- return err;
+ return cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_conservative);
}
static void __exit cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit(void)
{
cpufreq_unregister_governor(&cpufreq_gov_conservative);
- destroy_workqueue(kconservative_wq);
}
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index c631f27..58aa85e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -104,8 +104,6 @@ static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex);
-static struct workqueue_struct *kondemand_wq;
-
static struct dbs_tuners {
unsigned int sampling_rate;
unsigned int up_threshold;
@@ -667,7 +665,7 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
__cpufreq_driver_target(dbs_info->cur_policy,
dbs_info->freq_lo, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
}
- queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, kondemand_wq, &dbs_info->work, delay);
+ schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
}
@@ -681,8 +679,7 @@ static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
dbs_info->sample_type = DBS_NORMAL_SAMPLE;
INIT_DELAYED_WORK_DEFERRABLE(&dbs_info->work, do_dbs_timer);
- queue_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, kondemand_wq, &dbs_info->work,
- delay);
+ schedule_delayed_work_on(dbs_info->cpu, &dbs_info->work, delay);
}
static inline void dbs_timer_exit(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
@@ -814,7 +811,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
{
- int err;
cputime64_t wall;
u64 idle_time;
int cpu = get_cpu();
@@ -838,22 +834,12 @@ static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
MIN_SAMPLING_RATE_RATIO * jiffies_to_usecs(10);
}
- kondemand_wq = create_workqueue("kondemand");
- if (!kondemand_wq) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Creation of kondemand failed\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- }
- err = cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_ondemand);
- if (err)
- destroy_workqueue(kondemand_wq);
-
- return err;
+ return cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_ondemand);
}
static void __exit cpufreq_gov_dbs_exit(void)
{
cpufreq_unregister_governor(&cpufreq_gov_ondemand);
- destroy_workqueue(kondemand_wq);
}
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-03 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1294062595-30097-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2011-01-03 13:49 ` [PATCH 02/32] powerpc/cell: use system_wq in cpufreq_spudemand Tejun Heo
2011-01-03 13:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-01-25 14:29 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: update workqueue users - replace create_workqueue() Tejun Heo
2011-01-25 16:26 ` Dave Jones
2011-01-26 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2011-01-26 4:46 ` Greg KH
2011-02-01 10:44 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1294062595-30097-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox