From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tianyu.lan@intel.com Subject: [PATCH] Cpufreq/governor: Remove fossil comment Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:49:57 +0800 Message-ID: <1378903797-6350-1-git-send-email-tianyu.lan@intel.com> Return-path: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: rjw@sisk.pl, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Cc: Lan Tianyu , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Lan Tianyu cpufreq_set_policy() has been changed to origin __cpufreq_set_policy() and policy->lock has been converted to rewrite lock by commit 5a01f2. So remove the comment. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu --- This patch is based on patch "cpufreq: rename __cpufreq_set_policy() as cpufreq_set_policy()." http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137889464210638&w=2 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c index 0307809..4dbf1db 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c @@ -38,18 +38,7 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq) if (!per_cpu(cpu_is_managed, policy->cpu)) goto err; - /* - * We're safe from concurrent calls to ->target() here - * as we hold the userspace_mutex lock. If we were calling - * cpufreq_driver_target, a deadlock situation might occur: - * A: cpufreq_set (lock userspace_mutex) -> - * cpufreq_driver_target(lock policy->lock) - * B: cpufreq_set_policy(lock policy->lock) -> - * __cpufreq_governor -> - * cpufreq_governor_userspace (lock userspace_mutex) - */ ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); - err: mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex); return ret; -- 1.8.4.rc0.1.g8f6a3e5.dirty