Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cpufreq: tegra: Re-model Tegra cpufreq driver

Viresh Kumar
2013-12-18T11:11:35Z

On 17 December 2013 16:22, bilhuang <bilhuang@nvidia.com> wrote:
> Tegra20 DVFS is a little bit complicated due to the fact that we can't scale
> VDD_CPU directly, there are constraints or relationship to other power rails
> so I don't think it is a good idea to use generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver if
> we're going to support voltage scaling.

But why can't we handle that in a CPU specific regulator code?