From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
To: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:41:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400740894.21254.8.camel@x220> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK9yfHz2kdfkf+o7fKMRu=nMXxbcHJ227bjpvA=WXt6ptH3QRA@mail.gmail.com>
Sachin,
On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 08:52 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> The config symbol itself is not defined and hence could be removed.
> However I feel, the
> error message could be retained after trimming down the arguments a bit.
My reasoning is, of course, that never used code can simply be dropped.
But you want to print an error here. That's fine with me. I prefer if
you'd submit a patch that does that, as I have no idea whatsoever why an
error is needed here nor what that error should say.
I do hope you don't mind me prodding you if that takes too long, and
this pointless check of CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE is still here after, say,
another development cycle.
Paul Bolle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-22 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-21 19:53 [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err() Paul Bolle
2014-05-22 3:22 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-22 4:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-22 4:19 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-22 6:41 ` Paul Bolle [this message]
2014-05-22 8:23 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-05-23 15:05 ` [PATCH v2] cpufreq: s5pv210: drop check for CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE Paul Bolle
2014-05-23 15:10 ` Viresh Kumar
2014-05-23 15:14 ` Sachin Kamat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400740894.21254.8.camel@x220 \
--to=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sachin.kamat@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox