public inbox for cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: cleanups for 3.13
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:14:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1472734.1FogUomyWU@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpokOmv+CcL61dzkMgTNxY5rKb4A863CUAX_Jav4KyHF3DA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 07:56:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14 August 2013 01:31, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 07:01:04 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> 
> > Are the three patches in this series prerequisite for the big target_index
> > one?  If so, I think they can go into 3.12 actually, if they are ACKed by the
> > appropriate platform maintainers.
> 
> Yes, but they depend on cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() which
> will also go in 3.13 and so these will be made part of that series in
> future..

OK


      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-14 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-13 13:31 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: cleanups for 3.13 Viresh Kumar
2013-08-13 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: Expose frequency table Viresh Kumar
2013-08-13 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: let cpufreq core initialize struct policy fields Viresh Kumar
2013-08-13 13:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: Use generic cpufreq routines Viresh Kumar
2013-08-13 20:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: sa11x0: cleanups for 3.13 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-14  2:26   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-08-14 13:14     ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1472734.1FogUomyWU@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox