From: Rees Boffey <rees_b@bigpond.com>
To: cpufreq@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: overclocking?
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 11:42:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030629114243.31cd609f.rees_b@bigpond.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 479 bytes --]
in the cpufreq documenatation in my 2.4.21-benh kernel it mentions that arguments echoed to the /proc/cpufreq entry are first validated before any changes are made. my question is, is it possible to remove this validation to allow the overclocking of the cpu?
the ibook2.2 that i use is possible of being overclocked via software using an early version of the CHUD tools for osx but as of yet i have not found a way to do it under linux.
appreciate any replies/flames :)
rees.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-29 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-29 3:42 Rees Boffey [this message]
2003-06-29 22:24 ` overclocking? Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030629114243.31cd609f.rees_b@bigpond.com \
--to=rees_b@bigpond.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox