cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Young <a.d.y@btinternet.com>
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Acer Aspire 1300 buggy BIOS - hardcoded patch
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 01:44:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200307010144.37902.a.d.y@btinternet.com> (raw)

I have a similar problem with the bios of my sony vaio fx802. It has a mobile 
athlonxp 1500+ and has the following output from powernow-k7.

powernow: AMD K7 CPU detected.
powernow: PowerNOW! Technology present. Can scale: frequency and voltage.
powernow: Found PSB header at c00f74d0
powernow: Table version: 0x12
powernow: Flags: 0x0 (Mobile voltage regulator)
powernow: Settling Time: 100 microseconds.
powernow: Has 28 PST tables. (Only dumping ones relevant to this CPU).
powernow: PST:26 (@c00f76ac)
powernow:  cpuid: 0x780 fsb: 100        maxFID: 0x14    startvid: 0xe
powernow:    FID: 0x4 (5.0x [500MHz])   VID: 0xe (1.300V)
powernow:    FID: 0x8 (7.0x [700MHz])   VID: 0xe (1.300V)
powernow:    FID: 0xc (9.0x [900MHz])   VID: 0xe (1.300V)
powernow:    FID: 0x0 (11.0x [1100MHz]) VID: 0xe (1.300V)
powernow:    FID: 0x14 (13.0x [1300MHz])        VID: 0xe (1.300V)
powernow: Minimum speed 500 MHz. Maximum speed 1300 MHz.

Now my (possibly stupid) question is:
Why are the frequency/voltage settings controlled by the bios?
Surely these values are the same for all processors of the same speed and 
stepping number. Would it not be possible to obtain the recommended values 
directly from AMD and use them instead of the ones provided by the bios. Or 
can the motherboard hardware only generate certain values? 

Incidently does anybody have a athlonxp 1500+ with a 'correct' PST table? If 
so does voltage scaling make any noticeable difference to temperature or 
battery life?
-- 
Alex Young

             reply	other threads:[~2003-07-01  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-01  0:44 Alex Young [this message]
2003-07-01  5:34 ` Acer Aspire 1300 buggy BIOS - hardcoded patch Adachi, Kenichi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-01 12:24 davidendless
2003-07-01 13:34 ` Luigi Belli
2003-07-01 14:20   ` Stefan Hoppe
2003-06-30 12:36 Luigi Belli
2003-06-30 15:14 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-07-01 10:51   ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-07-04 17:04     ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-06-30 19:14 ` Stefan Gehn
2003-06-30 22:59 ` Francesco Poli
2003-06-30 23:20   ` Luigi Belli
2003-07-01 21:43     ` Francesco Poli
2003-07-01 10:12   ` Morrowind

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200307010144.37902.a.d.y@btinternet.com \
    --to=a.d.y@btinternet.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox