From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Subject: Re: rebased cpufreq patch?
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 14:34:48 +0200
Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
Message-ID: <20030707123448.GA1905@brodo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk>
Content-Disposition: inline
Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@www.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: anders@trudheim.com
Cc: davej@suse.de, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

> Hi there,
> 
> Is there any chance of getting the CPUFreq patch rebased against
> 2.4.22-pre3 ?

I'll be working on an updated version within the next few days, check
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/cpufreq/ for updated patches, please.

> I have been using the two patches linux-2.4.20-cpufreq.patch and
> cpufreq-centrino.patch against 2.4.21-rc7-ac1 since June 12th without
> any problems. From what I can tell, it is working very well indeed, so
> if it could be included in -pre4 it'd be great.

IMHO it's no stuff for 2.4.22. Davej/Russell, what's your opinion about 2.4.
in general?

	Dominik