From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Cpufreq: powernow-k7 weirdness Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 19:32:52 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030707193252.A9758@suse.de> References: <20030706012114.GW7796@poupinou.org> <20030707133240.GD7796@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030707133240.GD7796@poupinou.org>; from ducrot@poupinou.org on Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:32:40PM +0200 Errors-To: cpufreq-admin@www.linux.org.uk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: Juliusz Chroboczek , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 03:32:40PM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 02:58:37PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > >> Running stock 2.5.73 (ACPI + preempt) on a Compaq Presario 711, CPU is > > >> a 950MHz mobile Duron. I'm getting unexpected timings when enabling > > >> cpufreq. > > > > > There is a little bug in powernow-k7.c > > > > > ducrot@neptune $ cvs diff -u -r1.42 powernow-k7.c > > > > Yep, that did it. Thanks a lot. > > > > Why don't you push it into 2.5? > > Well, I supposed it was in linus bk tree. I will report then. It's in my cpufreq bitkeeper tree waiting for Linus to pull from for about a week. I've been a little preoccupied this weekend getting married, so I'll ask him to pull when I get back. Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs