cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: emmel <the_emmel@gmx.net>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: powernow-k7 (again) on 2.4.20
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:58:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030722115800.GA1160@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03072108302101.00222@gate>

Hi "emmel",

This is not a cpufreq bug, but a bug in the BIOS. It reports wrong values in
the "PST" which should be dumped in "dmesg" when you load the powernow
module [or once it is started, in case you built it into the kernel]. You
might want to try up- or downgrading your BIOS or to override the BIOS
table; some patches for this are in the list archives, Dave Jones intends to
add a generic capability to override the PST to the powernow module in
future.

	Dominik

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:30:21AM +0200, emmel wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I've posted that before, but I've serious trouble with cpufreq. It returns 
> once loaded it makes the CPU speed drop from 1.4GHz to 800MHz (666 when 
> throttled). If the kde info thingy is somewhat relyable at all that's for 
> real - the bogomips drop as well. Returning to 1.4GHz seems impossible 
> without restarting (I've tried unloading the module). Somehow cpufreq gets 
> the stupid idea that the CPU is scaleable between 500 and 600MHz which has to 
> be the reason for those odd results. We are talking about a Mobile Athlon XP 
> 1600+ here, BTW (though it's reported by linux as a 1500+). If you ask me 
> that's a serious problem. The odd thing, however, is that it didn't happen 
> with the same kernel version before. Maybe it depends on some intel code to 
> work correct (I used to have the CPU in the kernel set to PIII, now it's 
> correctly at Athlon) or maybe it has something to do with the swsp patch that 
> I *don't* have applied to my actual kernel. HELP!
> The same odd behavior(sp?) appears with clean 2.5.72 and 2.6.0-test1 kernels.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-22 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-21  6:30 powernow-k7 (again) on 2.4.20 emmel
2003-07-22 11:58 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
     [not found] ` <03072308501000.00222@gate>
     [not found]   ` <20030723163415.GA1870@brodo.de>
2003-07-24  5:10     ` emmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030722115800.GA1160@brodo.de \
    --to=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=the_emmel@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox