From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Athlon XP-M and cpufreq freezing Asus laptop to death Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:56:25 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030902125625.GA1225@redhat.com> References: <20030824164828.GA922@renditai.milesteg.arr> <20030825071009.GH19292@poupinou.org> <20030901200941.GF1358@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030901200941.GF1358@openzaurus.ucw.cz> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Pavel Machek Cc: Ducrot Bruno , Linux Kernel Mailing List , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:09:42PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > I'm also wondering if those athlons have the same kind of stuff than > > the opteron (Dave)? > > k8 has similar restriction to small steps, only. The k8 docs actually specify this though, the k7 ones don't iirc. Dave -- Dave Jones http://www.codemonkey.org.uk