cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, mochel@osdl.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:28:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030902200451.GA4095@brodo.de>; from linux@brodo.de on Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 2.)	frequency: B	frequency: A	-- the CPUfreq core and all
> 					   (external) drivers think[*] the
> 					   CPU frequency is equal to B, but
> 					   it is A. Because of this, the CPU
> 					   speed must be set AS SOON AS
> 					   POSSIBLE to B. But as all other
> 					   pieces of kernel code think it 
> 					   still equals "B", there is no
> 					   need to call notifiers. The
> 					   irqs_disabled() check in
> 					   cpufreq_notifiy_transition() is
> 					   triggered and blocks the call to
> 					   the notifiers.
> 
> So, [as long as you use the latest 2.6.0-test4 source] I doubt that it is 
> a hang in the cpufreq transition notifiers as they are never even called.

In which case, its probably this in cpu-sa1110.c:

        /*
         * The clock could be going away for some time.  Set the SDRAMs
         * to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles).  To get
         * through the whole array, we need to wait 262144 mclk cycles.
         * We wait 20ms to be safe.
         */
        sdram_set_refresh(2);
        set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
        schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000);

then.  I guess we need to case this with irqs_disabled() and use mdelay
instead.  Grr.

-- 
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk)                The developer of ARM Linux
             http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

      reply	other threads:[~2003-09-02 22:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-02 17:21 cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem Russell King
2003-09-02 20:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-02 22:28   ` Russell King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=mochel@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox