From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, mochel@osdl.org
Subject: Re: cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 23:28:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030902200451.GA4095@brodo.de>; from linux@brodo.de on Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:04:51PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> 2.) frequency: B frequency: A -- the CPUfreq core and all
> (external) drivers think[*] the
> CPU frequency is equal to B, but
> it is A. Because of this, the CPU
> speed must be set AS SOON AS
> POSSIBLE to B. But as all other
> pieces of kernel code think it
> still equals "B", there is no
> need to call notifiers. The
> irqs_disabled() check in
> cpufreq_notifiy_transition() is
> triggered and blocks the call to
> the notifiers.
>
> So, [as long as you use the latest 2.6.0-test4 source] I doubt that it is
> a hang in the cpufreq transition notifiers as they are never even called.
In which case, its probably this in cpu-sa1110.c:
/*
* The clock could be going away for some time. Set the SDRAMs
* to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles). To get
* through the whole array, we need to wait 262144 mclk cycles.
* We wait 20ms to be safe.
*/
sdram_set_refresh(2);
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(20 * HZ / 1000);
then. I guess we need to case this with irqs_disabled() and use mdelay
instead. Grr.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-02 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-02 17:21 cpufreq on ARM - 2.6 problem Russell King
2003-09-02 20:04 ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-02 22:28 ` Russell King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030902232817.G9345@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox