From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: longhaul: Unknown VIA CPU Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:45:24 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030903134524.GC4401@poupinou.org> References: <3F55187F.70707@free.fr> <1062596994.574.1.camel@sven> <20030903120038.GF1225@redhat.com> <20030903125204.GB4401@poupinou.org> <20030903132457.GH1225@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030903132457.GH1225@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dave Jones Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:24:57PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 02:52:04PM +0200, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > > > > also, the email > > > > address will need to be changed to the codemonkey one :) > > > > > > Already fixed in 2.6, not sure about the 2.4/2.4-ac backports. > > > > ducrot@neptune:~$ cvs rdiff -u -r LINUX_2_4 -rLINUX_2_5 cpufreq/linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpufreq/longhaul.c > > I'm not sure if I pushed the changes back to CVS after merging to > 2.5 mainline. ducrot@neptune:~$ diff -u ~/tmp/cpufreq/25/cpufreq/linux/arch/i386/kernel/cpufreq/longhaul.c \ /var/share/cvs/bitkeeper/cpufreq-2.5/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/longhaul.c @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ if (ret != 0) return ret; - policy->governor = CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_GOVERNOR; + policy->policy = CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE; policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; policy->cur = (unsigned int) (longhaul_get_cpu_fsb() * longhaul_get_cpu_mult() * 100); (cvs don't have some core update). Cheers, -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.