cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@brodo.de>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Which cpufreq driver is best for ...
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 21:27:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030903192749.GA30360@brodo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030903055749.GA21721@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:57:49AM +0200, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Which cpufreq driver is best for 
> 	Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.20GHz
> I can use the
> 	p4-clockmod
> and the
> 	speedstep-ich
> With the p4-clockmod I can adapt the freq between 274MHz and 2.2GHz,
> while with speedstep-ich I can only go between 1.2GHz and 2.2GHz. So I
> guess p4-clockmod is superior for my chip/cpu.
No, speedstep-ich is "superior". p4-clockmod only "throttles" the CPU, i.e.
it scales down the frequency but not the voltage. This results in an
approximately linear saving of energy. speedstep-ich also scales the
voltage, which causes much better saving of energy. 

And as long as ACPI C-States "idling" or APM "hlt" instructions work, the
CPU is "throttled"[*] if there is no work to do anyway, so the p4-clockmod
driver doesn't save you anything. The p4-clockmod driver almost only is
useful where ACPI or APM "idling" is borken.

> In the same line - are there any new governors with `intelligent'
> scaling techniques.

Not yet. Stay tuned, please.

	Dominik

[*] I know, this isn't technically true. But it's a good approximation...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-03 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-03  5:57 Which cpufreq driver is best for Norbert Preining
2003-09-03 11:37 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-09-03 14:32   ` Norbert Preining
2003-09-03 15:52     ` Mattia Dongili
2003-09-03 19:30   ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-03 19:50     ` Norbert Preining
2003-09-03 21:01       ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-04  7:09         ` Norbert Preining
2003-09-04  9:46           ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-04  9:59             ` Norbert Preining
2003-09-04 10:04               ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-04  9:57         ` Norbert Preining
2003-09-07 19:12           ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-04 12:25     ` Bas Mevissen
2003-09-03 19:27 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2003-09-04 12:36   ` Bas Mevissen
2003-09-04 23:27     ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-05  8:15       ` Bas Mevissen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030903192749.GA30360@brodo.de \
    --to=linux@brodo.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=preining@logic.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox