From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: Athlon XP-M and cpufreq freezing Asus laptop to death Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:23:10 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20030905092310.GP4401@poupinou.org> References: <20030824164828.GA922@renditai.milesteg.arr> <20030825071009.GH19292@poupinou.org> <20030901200941.GF1358@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20030902125625.GA1225@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030902125625.GA1225@redhat.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Dave Jones , Pavel Machek , Linux Kernel Mailing List , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:56:25PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:09:42PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I'm also wondering if those athlons have the same kind of stuff than > > > the opteron (Dave)? > > > > k8 has similar restriction to small steps, only. > > The k8 docs actually specify this though, the k7 ones don't iirc. > Hem, some of vid/fid combinations cant be used . But there is no verifications of such in powernow-k7 though. Since there is a need to change only one at a time... -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.