From: linux@brodo.de
To: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: add cpufreq_update_policy()
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:40:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030909204006.GA17962@brodo.de> (raw)
Add a new cpufreq_update_policy call:
Certain cpufreq policy notifers have different needs at different times.
Thus it needs to be possible to re-evaluate an already set cpufreq policy.
Note that the cpufreq policy should only be set by one person: the user.
Not any other in-kernel code [with one exception, of course: during
booting].
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
include/linux/cpufreq.h | 10 +++++
2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff -ruN linux-original/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
--- linux-original/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2003-09-09 22:35:26.000564328 +0200
+++ linux/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2003-09-09 22:35:47.083359256 +0200
@@ -741,26 +741,9 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
-/**
- * cpufreq_set_policy - set a new CPUFreq policy
- * @policy: policy to be set.
- *
- * Sets a new CPU frequency and voltage scaling policy.
- */
-int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+static int __cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *data, struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
int ret = 0;
- struct cpufreq_policy *data;
-
- if (!policy)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- data = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy->cpu);
- if (!data)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- /* lock this CPU */
- down(&data->lock);
memcpy(&policy->cpuinfo,
&data->cpuinfo,
@@ -827,6 +810,36 @@
}
error_out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpufreq_set_policy - set a new CPUFreq policy
+ * @policy: policy to be set.
+ *
+ * Sets a new CPU frequency and voltage scaling policy.
+ */
+int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
+{
+ int ret = 0;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *data;
+
+ if (!policy)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ data = cpufreq_cpu_get(policy->cpu);
+ if (!data)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* lock this CPU */
+ down(&data->lock);
+
+ ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(data, policy);
+ data->user_policy.min = data->min;
+ data->user_policy.max = data->max;
+ data->user_policy.policy = data->policy;
+ data->user_policy.governor = data->governor;
+
up(&data->lock);
cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
@@ -835,6 +848,41 @@
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_set_policy);
+/**
+ * cpufreq_update_policy - re-evaluate an existing cpufreq policy
+ * @cpu: CPU which shall be re-evaluated
+ *
+ * Usefull for policy notifiers which have different necessities
+ * at different times.
+ */
+int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpufreq_policy *data = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_policy policy;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ down(&data->lock);
+
+ memcpy(&policy,
+ &data,
+ sizeof(struct cpufreq_policy));
+ policy.min = data->user_policy.min;
+ policy.max = data->user_policy.max;
+ policy.policy = data->user_policy.policy;
+ policy.governor = data->user_policy.governor;
+
+ ret = __cpufreq_set_policy(data, &policy);
+
+ up(&data->lock);
+
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(data);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_update_policy);
+
/*********************************************************************
* EXTERNALLY AFFECTING FREQUENCY CHANGES *
diff -ruN linux-original/include/linux/cpufreq.h linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h
--- linux-original/include/linux/cpufreq.h 2003-09-09 21:34:05.627066144 +0200
+++ linux/include/linux/cpufreq.h 2003-09-09 22:35:47.084359104 +0200
@@ -60,6 +60,13 @@
unsigned int transition_latency; /* in 10^(-9) s */
};
+struct cpufreq_real_policy {
+ unsigned int min; /* in kHz */
+ unsigned int max; /* in kHz */
+ unsigned int policy; /* see above */
+ struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
+};
+
struct cpufreq_policy {
unsigned int cpu; /* cpu nr */
struct cpufreq_cpuinfo cpuinfo;/* see above */
@@ -74,6 +81,8 @@
struct semaphore lock; /* CPU ->setpolicy or ->target may
only be called once a time */
+ struct cpufreq_real_policy user_policy;
+
struct kobject kobj;
struct completion kobj_unregister;
};
@@ -217,6 +226,7 @@
*********************************************************************/
int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu);
+int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu);
/* the proc_intf.c needs this */
int cpufreq_parse_governor (char *str_governor, unsigned int *policy, struct cpufreq_governor **governor);
reply other threads:[~2003-09-09 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030909204006.GA17962@brodo.de \
--to=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox