cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: linux@brodo.de
Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, andrew.grover@intel.com,
	cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq]
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 01:13:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030909231303.GH211@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030909172135.GA4106@brodo.de>

Hi!

> Glad you liked [at least parts] of my patches.

:-). [BTW what is status of powernow-k8? is it pending or does it need
to be fixed some more?]

> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:29:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > http://www.brodo.de/cpufreq_tmp/acpi-2.6.0-test4-processor_thermal_throttling
> > > 	Move throttling into its own submodule, and register it with the new
> > > 	passive cooling module. Also, the now-useless "limit" interface is
> > > 	removed.
> > > 
> > 
> > Actually I liked to be able to echo 0:7 > limit and conserve battery/
> > make sure machine does not overheat  with it...
> 
> echo 7 > throttling should do the same thing. 

Will not first change in thermal system unthrottle it for me, behind
my back?

> However, don't expect any
> battey conservation if ACPI C2 throttling works, and to set custom levels
> against "overheating" there's a write access to
> /proc/acpi/thermal/*/trip_points too...

I'd should not expect battery conservation *when cpu is idle*. If I'm
moving windows in X, 0:7 limit will actually help. And it should allow
battery to be drained further by limiting maximum amps eaten by
CPU. [Ok, that's little evil, but being able to run for 30 minutes+ on
0% battery is nice ;-)].
								Pavel
-- 
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-09 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-04 22:24 [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle,throttling,thermal,cpufreq] Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-05  5:23 ` [ACPI] [PATCHES] ACPI Processor update [idle, throttling, thermal, cpufreq] Dmitry Torokhov
2003-09-05  6:52   ` Dominik Brodowski
2003-09-08 13:29 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 17:21   ` linux
2003-09-09 23:13     ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2003-09-09 23:29       ` linux
2003-09-10  0:00         ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030909231303.GH211@elf.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux@brodo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox