From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: 2.4 kernel patch on debian source 2.4.22 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:21:47 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031022082147.GL13989@poupinou.org> References: <002b01c39676$43910270$0100a8c0@bert> <1066607136.1501.16.camel@carryme.shs> <200310202135.43943.snowfire@blueyonder.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200310202135.43943.snowfire@blueyonder.co.uk> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Edward Macfarlane Smith Cc: Lars Weissflog , cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 09:35:43PM +0100, Edward Macfarlane Smith wrote: > I think you just need to add in all the lines that have a "+" without the plus > to the original file after the line with "obj-$(CONFIG_X86_VISWS_APIC) += > visws_apic.o". There are 4 files that mess up in a similar way if you apply > the patch from the weekend to the 2.4.23-pre7 kernel. It's some other changes > that upset the patch. > I presume the cpufreq patch will be updated soon, but if anyone really needs > it I can mail them the modified patches. > Regards, > Edward You may try to see -pac kernels at /pub/linux/kernel/people/bero/2.4/ since this guy try to maintain -ac series. -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.