From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: Coppermine, cpufreq Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:09:10 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031030140910.GH28351@poupinou.org> References: <3FA11700.8080908@tcpa-info.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FA11700.8080908@tcpa-info.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Matthias Hannich Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 02:49:52PM +0100, Matthias Hannich wrote: > Hi, > > I have a laptop (Gericom Webboy) with a PIII Coppermine. > I am working on a 2.4.22-kernel (from kernel.org) and patched the > patch-2.4.22-ac4.bz2 from Alan Cox against it. > > Because of having a low battery-capacity I tried to enable cpufreq and > ACPI-stuff in the kernel (and tried to compile them as modules as well). > ... > root:/usr/src/linux-2.4.22# insmod speedstep-ich > Using /lib/modules/2.4.22-ac4-486/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/speedstep-ich.o > /lib/modules/2.4.22-ac4-486/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/speedstep-ich.o: > unresolved symbol speedstep_get_processor_frequency > /lib/modules/2.4.22-ac4-486/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/speedstep-ich.o: > unresolved symbol speedstep_detect_processor > /lib/modules/2.4.22-ac4-486/kernel/arch/i386/kernel/speedstep-ich.o: > unresolved symbol speedstep_get_freqs > What about a modprobe speedstep-ich instead of insmod? PS: If modprobe speedstep-ich still do not work modpbore speedstep-lib modprobe speedstep-ich -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.