From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ducrot Bruno Subject: Re: problems with longhaul cpufreq driver. Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 20:38:52 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20031208193852.GA23953@poupinou.org> References: <20031208162600.mgillespie@Plus.Net> <1070901543.27939.103.camel@ashley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1070901543.27939.103.camel@ashley> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ashley Pittman Cc: mgillespie@mgillespie.plus.com, cpufreq On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0000, Ashley Pittman wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 16:26, mgillespie@mgillespie.plus.com wrote: > > > If I check the dmesg log, I see the following on startup: > > > > longhaul: VIA C3 'Ezra' [C5C] CPU detected. Longhaul v2 supported. > > longhaul: MinMult=5.0x MaxMult=6.0x > > longhaul: FSB: 0MHz Lowestspeed=0MHz Highestspeed=0MHz > > longhaul: FSB:0 Mult:10.0x > > The problem here is the FSB is being reported as 0, this is wrong. > > > Anyone else got this problem? > > I had a very similar problem with my c3 using a 2.6 kernel, I posted a > patch to this list a while ago that, whilst incorrect in some ways is > probably enough to allow the module to work. There was a discussion > about a better way to do it but I don't think that anything has been > committed yet. > Ashley: I don't know if you refer to: http://linux-dj.bkbits.net:8080/cpufreq/cset@1.1349.1.5?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-3w If yes, then that bit is probably not in cvs 2.4, nor in any linux-2.6 mainstream (I guess). -- Ducrot Bruno -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care.