From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [RFC] cpufreq_get() Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:34:41 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040124203441.GC6825@dominikbrodowski.de> References: <20040122190649.GC25416@poupinou.org> <20040122205620.GA8012@dominikbrodowski.de> <20040123100334.GD25416@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============32688211616751284==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040123100334.GD25416@poupinou.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk To: Ducrot Bruno Cc: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk --===============32688211616751284== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv" Content-Disposition: inline --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:03:34AM +0100, Ducrot Bruno wrote: > Anyway, this must be optional because the ACPI performance driver can't > detect speed... The hardware variant, yes. But for ACPI we can return what the cpufreq core thinks the current speed is. Dominik --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAEtbhZ8MDCHJbN8YRAnqqAJwIokTZVT8r3JoI5Xg5jhJQCuqOpACfRkIb UIK77oUzFS4XoSKnyzmwvNs= =RLA6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Md/poaVZ8hnGTzuv-- --===============32688211616751284== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --===============32688211616751284==--