From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francesco Poli Subject: Re: Help with Installation Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 17:16:33 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040403171633.610cc960.frx@firenze.linux.it> References: <200404031342.34522.ozeki@simnet.is> <20040403145045.GV19001@poupinou.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0171607721==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040403145045.GV19001@poupinou.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk --===============0171607721== Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__3_Apr_2004_17_16_33_+0200_Qh=w=RfZ.5.IDu1J" --Signature=_Sat__3_Apr_2004_17_16_33_+0200_Qh=w=RfZ.5.IDu1J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 16:50:45 +0200 Bruno Ducrot wrote: > tar xzvfp cpufreq-...tar.gz > cd cpufreq > ./patchin.sh /path/to/kernel/sources > > Do *not* remove the cpufreq directory that was unpacked. Why did you set up such a strange procedure? What are the advantages over a simple patch like the old ones found in http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/projects/cpufreq/ ? I'd say a gzipped (or bzip2ed) patch file would be much more easy to apply (especially with automatic tools such as Debian kernel-package, that is, make-kpkg), but of course I may be wrong... Could you please explain the rationale behind such a choice? -- | GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4 | You're compiling a program Francesco | Key fingerprint = | and, all of a sudden, boom! Poli | C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 | -- from APT HOWTO, | 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4 | version 1.8.0 --Signature=_Sat__3_Apr_2004_17_16_33_+0200_Qh=w=RfZ.5.IDu1J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAbtVWePQnm91t/PQRAsOEAKCaTsRGADIo0kz6z2DqEwo20qlTYQCggb5d XCoVaZAoibqHlg5TcGbOsYM= =sdgs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__3_Apr_2004_17_16_33_+0200_Qh=w=RfZ.5.IDu1J-- --===============0171607721== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --===============0171607721==--