From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthias brill Subject: Re: banias with different (unusual?) model_name Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:53:16 +0200 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040821115316.GA2582@akamail.com> References: <20040820093344.GA2923@akamail.com> <1093008335.30968.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: matthias.brill@akamail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1542165239==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1093008335.30968.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk To: Alan Cox , Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: linux-kernel , cpufreq list --===============1542165239== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi alan, jeremy On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:25:36PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > i've found a pentium-m banias which reports "Mobile Genuine Intel(R) > > processor 1400MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo. this (strange?) signature > > prevents speedstep-centrino.c from working properly. >=20 > Signatures appear to be BIOS set so that would make sense. that fact wasn't obvious to me -- i've updated the BIOS and the strange banias signature is now gone. it reports the expected "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1400MHz" string now. in excess the "ACPI-behaviour" changes from "totally broken" to "not working" which is kind of a progress... 8-} On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 07:19:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Yeah, there seem to be a few of these around. I'm just not certain that > they're identical to "normal" Banias as far as operating points go. it seems that the reported value depends on the mental health of the BIOS-programmer at hand, therefore the suplied string might not be trustworthy. if i understand correctly, the type of the cpu can be determined by looking at the family, model and stepping -- assuming that these values are reported directly by the CPUID (0FA2) instruction.=20 the BIOS supplied model_name string in speedstep-centrino.c is parsed to get the clock cycle time of the cpu. is this actually supposed to be the "right" way (or worse: the only way) to get this information? thias --=20 Matthias Brill --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBJzes15PQg+xdZ4cRAjSeAJ9VmtjiMrdtbNl/3kWXDfWuakjM0QCg32V4 3YG4FoaJu2AQ715gSyNxZ4A= =7430 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- --===============1542165239== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cpufreq mailing list Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq --===============1542165239==--