From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: Kronos <kronos@kronoz.cjb.net>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>,
cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix cpu recognization if BIOS does not set cpu to max freq [was: Re: [Bug 3600] New: Cpu recognization fails after upgrade from 2.6.7 to 2.6.9]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:35:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041029153544.GA9799@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041023214325.GA13050@dreamland.darkstar.lan>
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:43:25PM +0200, Kronos wrote:
> On some notebooks BIOS fails to set K7 CPUs to the maximum frequency.
> powernow-k7 fails to load or falls back to ACPI (if available) with
> wrong values. If a bogus FSB speed is detected a workaround should be
> used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Tettamanti <kronos@kronoz.cjb.net>
>
> --- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c 2004-10-23 22:29:40.000000000 +0200
> +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c 2004-10-23 22:39:23.000000000 +0200
> @@ -598,6 +598,13 @@
>
> /* A K7 with powernow technology is set to max frequency by BIOS */
> fsb = (10 * cpu_khz) / fid_codes[fidvidstatus.bits.MFID];
> + if (fsb < 99000) {
> + /* BIOS did not set the processor to the max frequency.
> + * This does not respect AMD recomandation, but it happens.
> + */
So if the motherboard allows for modifying the FSB, and I decide to set the
FSB to 98 MHz, it breaks... What about the following approaches?
- yet another DMI table?
- there's an entry "fsbspeed" in pst_s. Is this useful to determining the
FSB, and then checking whether FSB*CFID makes more sense than FSB*MFID
when comparing it to cpu_khz?
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-20 14:13 [Bug 3600] New: Cpu recognization fails after upgrade from 2.6.7 to 2.6.9 bugme-daemon
2004-10-20 15:47 ` Kronos
2004-10-20 16:05 ` Daniele Bonomi
2004-10-20 16:51 ` Kronos
2004-10-21 10:25 ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-10-21 16:10 ` Kronos
2004-10-23 21:43 ` [PATCH] Fix cpu recognization if BIOS does not set cpu to max freq [was: Re: [Bug 3600] New: Cpu recognization fails after upgrade from 2.6.7 to 2.6.9] Kronos
2004-10-29 15:35 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-11-10 20:15 ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-11-02 21:10 ` [Bug 3600] New: Cpu recognization fails after upgrade from 2.6.7 to 2.6.9 Dave Jones
2004-11-02 22:13 ` [PATCH for other issue included] " Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-20 19:37 ` Daniele Bonomi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041029153544.GA9799@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=kronos@kronoz.cjb.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox