From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan De Luyck Subject: Re: cpufreq on-demand governor up_treshold? Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:40:58 +0100 Message-ID: <200503141340.59714.lkml@kcore.org> References: <200503140829.04750.lkml@kcore.org> <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <42354400.7070500@tremplin-utc.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Eric Piel Cc: davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@zenii.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@dominikbrodowski.net On Monday 14 March 2005 08:57, Eric Piel wrote: > Jan De Luyck a =E9crit : > > Hello lists, > > > > (please cc me from cpufreq list) > > > > I've since yesterday started using the ondemand governor. Seems to work > > fine, tho I can't seem to find a reason why it keeps scaling my process= or > > speed upwards tho the processor use never exceeds 30% (been watching top > > -d 1). > > > > > > Any hints? > > You can try the three attached patches in the order : > ondemand-cleanup-factorise-idle-measurement-2.6.11.patch > ondemand-save-idle-up-for-all-cpu-2.6.11.patch > ondemand-automatic-downscaling-2.6.11-accepted.patch > > They are available on the cpufreq list but as it's difficult to access > it I'm sending them again, all together. These are the last things that > Venki and I have been working on. It should solve your problem > (actually, only the last patch, but it depends on the two previous > patches). Please, let me know if it works. Okay, now the behaviour of the ondemand governor looks more 'sane'. Thanks,= it=20 looks like a huge improvement :) Jan =2D-=20 Snow and adolescence are the only problems that disappear if you ignore them long enough.