cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Patch: Fix pending timer stuck condition
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:19:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051021191923.GA5827@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84303218896@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>

On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 01:02:48PM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
 > AMD recently discovered that on some hardware,
 > there is a race condition possible when a C-state
 > change request goes onto the bus at the same time
 > as a P-state change request.  Both requests happen,
 > but the southbridge hardware only acknowledges the
 > C-state change.  The PowerNow! driver is then 
 > stuck in a loop, waiting for the P-state change
 > acknowledgement.  The driver eventually times out,
 > but can no longer perform P-state changes.
 > 
 > It turns out the solution is to resend the P-state
 > change, which the southbridge will acknowledge
 > normally.
 > 
 > Thanks to Johannes Winkelmann for reporting this
 > and testing the fix.

Excellent detective work!
I'll get this sent along to Linus for inclusion in 2.6.14
as there have been a number of reports of this.

One question though, this part..

-               if (i++ > 0x1000000) {
+               if (i++ > 10000) {
                        printk(KERN_ERR PFX "detected change pending stuck\n");
                        return 1;


means that on affected hardware, we'll see that msg a lot more
regularly now. Was this intentional, or a leftover debugging change ?

Final nit, please add a Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
line for future patches.  (I still apply them if they lack that line,
but following the established protocol is a nice bonus touch ;-)

		Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-21 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-21 18:02 Patch: Fix pending timer stuck condition Langsdorf, Mark
2005-10-21 19:19 ` Dave Jones [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-21 19:42 Langsdorf, Mark
2005-10-21 21:34 Devriendt, Paul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20051021191923.GA5827@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox