From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Braun Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.14] cpufreq: don't suggest speedstep-centrino for Dothan-based Celeron-M processors Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:29:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20051202202910.07220354@tilion.getrex.org> References: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60067F3CAD@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <88056F38E9E48644A0F562A38C64FB60067F3CAD@scsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" Cc: CPUFreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Bruno Ducrot , Dominik Brodowski , davej@redhat.com On Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:58:12 -0800 "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" wrote: > For short term though, atleast there need to be some big Red flag > against using p4-clockmod for powersave purposes. Having that info in CONFIG > help doesn't seem to be working. I didn't see any such information in CONFIG_HELP. Still, I'm happy to use it for thermal management too :-) Bye Felix