From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: p4_clockmod broken in 2.6.16-rc? kernels
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:55:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060314095551.A4913@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060310054723.GC5600@redhat.com>; from davej@redhat.com on Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:47:23AM -0500
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 12:47:23AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 08:07:44PM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >
> > Great to hear that the patch helped. I had a typo in the patch header
> > and attaching an updated patch.
> >
> > Dave: Please push this patch towards base. This was a bug in one of the
> > recent changes in p4-clockmod.c
>
> Applied, thanks. I fixed this one up by hand, but next time can you
> inline the patch instead of attaching it ?
Sorry for all the hassle. I wanted to send that patch out quick, before 2.6.16.
And hence ended up sending it as an attachment using the dump mail client.
> btw, should acpi-cpufreq/speedstep-ich also have those errata workarounds?
No. These two errats seem specific to clock modulation and not speedstep. So,
no changes required for speedstep.
Looking at the workarounds in p4-clockmod.c again...
Seems like some more work is needed on this. The current workaround doesn't
seem to cover all the affected steppings and also it is using int [NR_CPUS]
array to store a single bit (whether error is present or not). I will send a
follow-on cleanup patch, which I think can wait until 2.6.16.
Thanks,
Venki
>
> Thanks.
>
> Dave
>
> [1] Actually this was even longer. Due to me missing chopping a MIME
> mailheader, it still confused git-apply, and I scratched my head
> for some time until Linus clued me in. MIME- just say no!
>
> --
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-10 4:07 p4_clockmod broken in 2.6.16-rc? kernels Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-03-10 5:47 ` Dave Jones
2006-03-14 17:55 ` Venkatesh Pallipadi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-09 13:53 Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2006-03-10 3:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2006-03-09 6:11 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060314095551.A4913@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox