From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bert hubert Subject: Re: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 regression: cpufreq broken since 2.6.18-rc1 on pentium4 Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 18:51:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20060730165137.GA26511@outpost.ds9a.nl> References: <20060730120844.GA18293@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20060730160738.GB13377@irc.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060730160738.GB13377@irc.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zwane@arm.linux.org.uk, davej@redhat.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tony@atomide.com, akpm@osdl.org, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk > I have similar problem with cpufreq-nforce2 -- http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/7/234 > I haven't do a git-bisect yet. To recap, cpufreq died for at least two people (Tomasz Torcz and me) between 2.6.17 and 2.6.18-rc1. I've cc'd everybody who touched cpufreq according to the shortlog. Abundant details are in: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/30/87 New information is that I've narrowed it down from between 2.6.16.9 and 2.6.18-rc1 to between 2.6.17.7 (which works) and 2.6.18-rc1 (which doesn't). The problem exists both with cpufreq as modules and staticly, and both with P4 and nforce2. Please let me know how I can help you solve this problem. I'll try a git bisect but a lot of the cpufreq changes appear to be interrelated, so I'm unsure if it will work. Thanks! -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://netherlabs.nl Open and Closed source services