cpufreq Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Langsdorf, Mark" <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Cc: Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, nemesis@icequake.net
Subject: Re: writing a cpufreq driver
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 15:47:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060921194714.GH17065@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449F58C868D8D4E9C72945771150BDF153669@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>

On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:38:22PM -0500, Langsdorf, Mark wrote:
 > >  > 1.  The first time cpufreq changes speed, I get the whole 
 > > "Losing some
 > >  > ticks... checking if CPU frequency changed." then 
 > > eventually "Losing too
 > >  > many ticks!" and timer switches to PIT.  This does not 
 > > happen when I use
 > >  > the /dev/toshiba driver to change speeds from userspace.  
 > > Not sure what
 > >  > is going on here...  SMI handler latency is between 6 and 7 ms.
 > > 
 > > Is loops_per_jiffy being correctly scaled on a speed transition?
 > > Hmm, powernow-k7.c seems to be the only driver that's calling 
 > > recalibrate_cpu_khz()
 > 
 > Do drivers need to be doing that?  I would have thought the
 > time could would do it after receiving the notification.

Looking at it again..
cpufreq_notify_transition() is calling adjust_jiffies()
which should be doing the same thing, so we should be good to go.

It looks like feasible that recalibrate_cpu_khz() could actually
be killed off.

	Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-21 19:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-21 18:48 writing a cpufreq driver Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 19:31 ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 19:38   ` Langsdorf, Mark
2006-09-21 19:47     ` Dave Jones [this message]
2006-09-22 15:44       ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 15:49         ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 20:08   ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 20:44     ` Dave Jones
2006-09-21 21:03       ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-21 21:13         ` Dave Jones
2006-09-22 14:13           ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 14:39             ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 15:48               ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:01                 ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 15:51               ` Dave Jones
2006-09-22 15:39 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:00   ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-22 16:05     ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-22 16:11       ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 15:07         ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-23 15:21           ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 15:44             ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-23 16:03               ` Ryan Underwood
2006-09-23 16:13                 ` Bruno Ducrot
2006-09-25 15:39                   ` Ryan Underwood
2006-10-02  2:19                     ` Dominik Brodowski
2006-09-25 16:44                   ` Ryan Underwood
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-22 16:31 Erik Slagter
2006-09-23 15:31 ` Bruno Ducrot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060921194714.GH17065@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=Cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
    --cc=nemesis@icequake.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox