From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 06:46:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20070406104601.GA30225@redhat.com> References: <20070406101928.GB29169@stusta.de> <20070406102914.GA27372@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:38:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi > > > > lets kill this in 2.6.22 > > given that there's no way this is going to make it into 2.6.21, isn't > that what adrian is proposing here? even if so, it's a little premature. Lets get 2.6.21 out the door first. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk