From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 00:38:21 +0200 Message-ID: <20070406223821.GL29169@stusta.de> References: <20070220000641.GG13958@stusta.de> <4616CA22.7040005@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4616CA22.7040005@tmr.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bill Davidsen Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI. > > > >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > > > It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which > are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality. > Yes, people can take 10-15 minutes to find and read previous discussion, > but one or two sentences who generate less concern and noise on the list. For everyone on linux-kernel, the text my patch removes in feature-removal-schedule.txt should be sufficient. Users already had a printk() stating that it was deprecated. > Bill Davidsen cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed