From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dominik Brodowski Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] #if 0 cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get() Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 19:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20071024173427.GA1723@isilmar.linta.de> References: <20071024162312.GH30533@stusta.de> <20071024093839.232e5cd5@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071024093839.232e5cd5@laptopd505.fenrus.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, Adrian Bunk , Thomas Gleixner , cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:38:39AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:23:12 +0200 > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > cpufreq.c:cpufreq_get() no longer has any user. > > > > it's... also a really bad/buggy interface... frquency is a per cpu > property for one, ... which is why cpufreq_get() has one argument, the CPU id. Dominik