From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 10564] Randomly sets max freq equal to min freq Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080430102935.BA3EF108061@picon.linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10564 ------- Comment #8 from trenn@suse.de 2008-04-30 03:29 ------- commit e56a727b023d40d1adf660168883f30f2e6abe0a Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi Date: Mon Apr 28 15:13:43 2008 -0400 [CPUFREQ] Make acpi-cpufreq more robust against BIOS freq changes behind our back. If this does not help, I wonder whether ignore_ppc=1 as processor module parameter helps? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.