From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 10564] Randomly sets max freq equal to min freq
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 03:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080430102935.BA3EF108061@picon.linux-foundation.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
In-Reply-To:
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10564
------- Comment #8 from trenn@suse.de 2008-04-30 03:29 -------
commit e56a727b023d40d1adf660168883f30f2e6abe0a
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi
Date: Mon Apr 28 15:13:43 2008 -0400
[CPUFREQ] Make acpi-cpufreq more robust against BIOS freq changes behind
our back.
If this does not help, I wonder whether ignore_ppc=1 as processor module
parameter helps?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.