From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 10144] Wrong cpufreq speeds detected when overclocking (speeds
	reported using stock FSB, not overclocked)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 11:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20080528182610.5780B108046@picon.linux-foundation.org>
References: <bug-10144-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <bug-10144-3570@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
List-Id: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/private/cpufreq>
List-Post: <mailto:cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
List-Help: <mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq>,
	<mailto:cpufreq-request@lists.linux.org.uk?subject=subscribe>
Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk
Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk
To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10144





------- Comment #14 from knuckles@gmail.com  2008-05-28 11:26 -------
But if it works almost perfectly, and the only problem is the speed displayed,
why simply say "we don't support it"?
Are there really that many changes for cpufreq when the processor is under- or
overclocked.

I for one, think that cpufreq is *more* important when overclocking: my cpu is
working at a lower frequency and cooler when idle, and only works at a higher
frequency when needed, instead of all the time.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.