From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 11139] warning in cpufreq.c on E450 Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080723090432.862C210800A@picon.linux-foundation.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: cpufreq-bounces@lists.linux.org.uk Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org+glkc-cpufreq=m.gmane.org@lists.linux.org.uk To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11139 ------- Comment #3 from bunk@kernel.org 2008-07-23 02:04 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > This looks strange. > > The warning is because init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list_called is not set > to true (yet). However, that should have been done in pure_initcall stage which > is waaaaay before auxio_probe, which is at fs_initcall stage. Any experts on > the ordering of initcalls, and why this is messed up here? cpufreq_register_notifier() is called by arch/sparc64/kernel/time.c:time_init() which runs before the normal initcalls. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.