From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powertop: Use cpufreqlib for getting cpufreqstats info
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:58:49 +0200
Message-ID: <201008261258.50070.trenn@suse.de>
References: <1282746211-1227-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <1282746211-1227-2-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <AANLkTinU_OqbcOO6LqQyb7Z_yFm0ddAfx6FFBo4aShym@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinU_OqbcOO6LqQyb7Z_yFm0ddAfx6FFBo4aShym@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Amit Arora <amit.arora@linaro.org>
Cc: power@bughost.org, auke@linux.intel.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>

On Thursday 26 August 2010 09:14:35 Amit Arora wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
> wrote:
..
> But, if you are suggesting this as alternate to my previous post
> (titled "Make PowerTOP generic"), then it doesn't meet the purpose.
No, I am not suggesting this as a replacement of your code.
Only overlap is to make max frequencies dynamic.
And because the code overlaps/conflicts it made sense
to send this as part of this thread.

But I can rebase my patch(es) if your stuff is figured out, no problem.

    Thomas