From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: Rename cpufrequtils into cpupowerutils and provide some basic cpuidle functionality Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:06:28 +0200 Message-ID: <201009281306.28835.trenn@suse.de> References: <1285255810-11252-1-git-send-email-trenn@suse.de> <20100925123710.GA29610@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100925123710.GA29610@comet.dominikbrodowski.net> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Dominik Brodowski Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 25 September 2010 14:37:10 Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hey, > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:30:06PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > here my latest patchset. > > Thanks. Thank you! > > If this isn't totally wrong, I'd appreciate if you could > > push these already (into a separate branch for now?) > > Applied into the "cpupowerutils" branch, and pushed that to > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/kernel/cpufreq/cpufrequtils.git > > I split up one patch into two parts, and added two patches on top. Let me > know what you think about this. Absolutely fine. I packaged cpupowerutils, this time with a proper split of library and devel packages. I then got these packages: cpupowerutils cpupowerutils-bench libcpupower0 libcpupower-devel and the obsolete one (should get removed as soon as no app is linking against -lcpufreq anymore): libcpufreq0 Whoever wants to have a look or try out these packages, they can be found here, built against all kind of SUSE distros (Factory, 11.3, 11.2, 11.1, SLE_11, SLE11_SP1 - x86_64 and i386): http://software.opensuse.org/search?q=cpupower I found some minor bugs/enhancements, will post them in a minute. Comments, suggestions, etc. are very welcome. Thanks, Thomas