From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] CPUFREQ/S3C64xx: Move S3C64xx CPUfreq driver into
 drivers/cpufreq
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:01:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20110601200146.GC12949@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <20110601094313.GA23122@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <1306921493-30911-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <BANLkTinR_WLjsgm5ogt_BbJwPFC0Kc1Dqg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20110601095811.GB13591@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <4DE69A66.9090002@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4DE69A66.9090002@samsung.com>
Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <cpufreq.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@infradead.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 01:00:38PM -0700, Kukjin Kim wrote:

> As I remember, 800Mhz support on S3C6410 is ok and replied about that.
> Then isn't there any progress in my side?...I'm outside of my office.

Yes, you replied and said it was OK but it's not appeared in -next yet.