From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] EXYNOS: Initialize locking_frequency with initial frequency Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:35:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20120213143555.GA1793@redhat.com> References: <1327466713-29101-1-git-send-email-tushar.behera@linaro.org> <4F291D44.4040502@linaro.org> <4F334ECA.5000507@linaro.org> <4F38DDF0.6030609@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F38DDF0.6030609@linaro.org> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tushar Behera Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, jc.lee@samsung.com, myungjoo.ham@samsung.com On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:24:56PM +0530, Tushar Behera wrote: > >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> index 5467879..7cfb516 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c > >>> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) > >>> > >>> cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(exynos_info->freq_table, policy->cpu); > >>> > >>> + locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0); > >>> + > >>> /* set the transition latency value */ > >>> policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 100000; > > Any concerns with this patch? it's in my queue for applying to -next. I'll clear everything out today. Dave