From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Baltieri Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix problem with cpufreq_pndemand or cpufreq_conservative Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 01:33:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20121229003341.GA30982@balto.lan> References: <50DE1A74.4040607@lwfinger.net> <3226192.H2BxHSuKio@vostro.rjw.lan> <50DE2F32.1010207@lwfinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50DE2F32.1010207@lwfinger.net> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Larry Finger Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , viresh kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux PM list , LKML On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 05:45:54PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > >I wonder if that's avoidable? The intention is not to create an additional > >module, clearly. > > It appears not to be possible. I don't know enough about to kmake to > understand why it is forcing a new module. Perhaps some expert knows > what Kconfig or Makefile magic will prevent that. kbuild is building an additional module just because the makefile is adding the new objects in the obj-m list directly, as in: obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o To build just two modules the Makefile would have to be modified [1] into something into something like: obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND) += cpufreq_ondemand_mod.o cpufreq_ondemand_mod-y := cpufreq_ondemand.o cpufreq_governor.o obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE) += cpufreq_conservative_mod.o cpufreq_conservative_mod-y := cpufreq_conservative.o cpufreq_governor.o so that only two .o are added to obj-m, but that's not correct either as you end up with cpufreq_governor symbols exported twice. I think the only way would be to force cpufreq_governor as builtin with an automatic Kconfig option. Fabio 1. http://lxr.linux.no/#linux+v3.7.1/Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt#L191 -- Fabio Baltieri