From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [arch-general] powernow-k8 fails to load with linux 3.7.2 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:54:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20130121105455.GA4823@pd.tnic> References: <1448223.sdUJnNSRz4@vostro.rjw.lan> <20130116231728.GA10204@x1.alien8.de> <20130116181600.4c48ee3b@bluemoon> <20130117094648.GD30700@pd.tnic> <20130117194044.7a18a29d@bluemoon> <20130118113717.GA6808@pd.tnic> <20130118133233.4521ddb6@hydra> <20130119120814.GA4026@pd.tnic> <20130120231432.67351ee6@bluemoon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1358765517; bh=djb8FpefFHu20akGmz1EOk5P/WM2E9Abs3hYqZVOgEM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=VE12ukaWfXlCkpwTnI7LzBL2PFrsreFrST/H/Q Iq4RTM/Y0dxVo85+QlqyOa8pcHDAPU0+Ti+cJwN/OYN+hvvTZFSfI2rBKV2Yr2A9ld0 NP+FFJG+DAIRLNyEUdAr+QEH6zSShjo0cfi8lPu+3LTfTJmA3M/ChjFg8dNCKkjn60= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1358765517; bh=djb8FpefFHu20akGmz1EOk5P/WM2E9Abs3hYqZVOgEM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=VE12ukaWfXlCkpwTnI7LzBL2PFrsreFrST/H/Q Iq4RTM/Y0dxVo85+QlqyOa8pcHDAPU0+Ti+cJwN/OYN+hvvTZFSfI2rBKV2Yr2A9ld0 NP+FFJG+DAIRLNyEUdAr+QEH6zSShjo0cfi8lPu+3LTfTJmA3M/ChjFg8dNCKkjn60= Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130120231432.67351ee6@bluemoon> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Leonid Isaev Cc: Matthew Garrett , =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOp?= Przywara , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tom Gundersen , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 11:14:32PM -0600, Leonid Isaev wrote: > Matthew and Borislav, thanks a lot for the patch and explanation! > > I applied the above patch on top of linux 3.7.3 -- it does generate > the aliases and fixes the autoprobing issue, at least on my AMD > machine. Should we expect it in 3.7.4 or 3.8? Otherwise, I'll forward > it to archlinux devel ML to be possibly included in current -stable > kernel. Also, Borislav, this patch is not in your patch series, is it? Yeah, it's not. Matthew, care to write a proper commit message with your SOB and Leonid's Tested-by pls? Then Rafael could take it for 3.8 and tag it for 3.7-stable, methinks. Leonid, thanks for testing. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --