From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0abata?= Subject: Re: Fehler bei cpufreq-info Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:31:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20130405143109.GA1451@noon.brq.redhat.com> References: <51558EDC.2040503@gmx.de> <515B4DB3.9040507@gmx.de> <20130403075303.GA24986@rincewind.usersys.redhat.com> <2017362.3fkGx2zPkK@skinner.arch.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2017362.3fkGx2zPkK@skinner.arch.suse.de> Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Rainer Maier , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:01:20PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday, April 03, 2013 09:53:04 AM Petr =C5=A0abata wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:29:23PM +0200, Rainer Maier wrote: > > > Hi Thomas, > > > thanks for your info. > > > I removed cpufrequtils, but when I tried to install cpupower by aptit= ude > > > it didn't know the package. I searched for it, but couldn't find one. > > > Would you perhaps know which packet to install ? > > >=20 > > > Thanks > > > Rainer > >=20 > > The cpupower utilities are part of the kernel tree now and > > included in the kernel-tools package on Fedora. I suppose it > > will be something similar in your distribution. >=20 > Sigh. > I guess you have a separate perf package at least? Yes, but technically it's a kernel subpackage. > It would be great if cpupower gets packaged separately for two > reasons: > 1) cpuidle and cpufreq are used by a lot archs nowadays: > ppc, arm, afaik S390 at least they tried,... =20 > I expect the kernel-tools package will only compile on X86? They used to be a separate package before the code moved to kernel. I see the package is build for ppc[64] but not on s390[x]. I have no information on arm[64] at the moment but if there are issues, I'll let you know :) > 2) To avoid confusion like above, so that this tool can easily > be found by people searching for it. This is handled by package manager. Besides the list of of binaries the tools package should also act as a replacement for former cpufrequtils and cpupowerutils packages. > Petr: Would you mind forward this to the maintainer. > I once made sure cpupower compiles on ppc iirc, if someone > runs into arch specific compile (or runtime) issues, please let > me know, this should get fixed then. See above. I'll forward this to kernel owners in Fedora. Regards, Petr --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlFe4CwACgkQT+hZYwG3Kb66eAD9Ey9Cm0vO+K2H2yLBMt0PZhnC Viw7scLbFxGFLYRDxHMA/0J+pYoFemY5FTuP0RHrGzu2H3fOlbG48aMzCWQnT7r6 =9y5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--