Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: allow disabling cpufreq drivers

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>]

On Friday 19 April 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Commit 6e6aac7590 "ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate clock support to common
> clock framework" broke support for the exynos cpufreq drivers.
> While we're waiting for a fix for this, let's get back to a state
> where the kernel builds again with the cpufreq subsystem enabled
> but ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ disabled. I assume that this was the intention
> behind this Kconfig symbol anyway.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

Hmm, actually this conflicts heavily with the other Kconfig changes
in the cpufreq tree. Any other idea how to resolve this?

	Arnd

> ---
> Rafael, I'm putting this patch into the arm-soc tree now to avoid
> a bug based on a patch that I got from Kukjin. If you have any
> objections, please let me know so I can revert it again.
> 
> Everyone else: Why does 6e6aac7590 have your "Tested-by" and
> "Signed-off-by" tags on it when it's obviously broken? Who is
> fixing this? Having no working exynos cpufreq support in 3.10
> would be a serious regression.