From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukasz Majewski Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:08:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20130627110813.6797b1fe@amdc308.digital.local> References: <1370502472-7249-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> <1371661969-7660-5-git-send-email-l.majewski@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , Linux PM list , Vincent Guittot , Jonghwa Lee , Myungjoo Ham , linux-kernel , Lukasz Majewski , Andre Przywara , Daniel Lezcano , Kukjin Kim , Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:28:11 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 19 June 2013 22:42, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the > > information related to boost support. > > > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, > > the boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes > > were exported. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham > > > > Changes for v4: > > - None > > > > Changes for v3: > > - Remove low level boost code > > - Move boost management code to cpufreq core code > > - Use boost_supported flag to indicate if driver supports over > > clocking > > > > Changes for v2: > > - Removal of struct cpufreq_boost > > - Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag > > - low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > Yes, this looks fine.. > > I will Ack the whole series in the end, so no individual acks :) Ok. -- Best regards, Lukasz Majewski Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group